Sorting by

×

Newsom Demands More Taxpayer Money

Advertisements

Newsom is at it again.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is seeking another $1 million in taxpayer-funded legal resources as his administration faces growing federal scrutiny over Medi-Cal, hospice fraud and the state’s oversight of government healthcare programs.

The new request comes as congressional investigators examine whether California had adequate safeguards in place to prevent fraudulent operators from exploiting taxpayer-funded programs.

If approved, the additional $1 million would reportedly bring the total amount directed to Newsom’s office for these legal matters to $2.25 million.

The request is drawing criticism from Republican lawmakers, while Newsom’s administration says California is cooperating with Congress and argues that the federal investigations are politically motivated.

Newsom Seeks Another $1 Million

According to a funding request reported by the California Post and New York Post, Newsom’s office wants an additional $1 million to address legal matters involving Medi-Cal program integrity, hospice fraud and emergency healthcare coverage for undocumented immigrants.

The governor’s office previously received $500,000 in September 2025 and another $750,000 in April.

The latest allocation would therefore raise the total to $2.25 million.

The money would reportedly come from a larger $25 million legal-defense fund California established for disputes involving the Trump administration.

The latest request arrives at a time when questions about government spending, healthcare fraud and accountability have placed California’s massive healthcare system under increased scrutiny.

Republican Lawmaker Questions the Expense

Assemblymember David Tangipa, a Fresno Republican, criticized the request and argued that California taxpayers are being asked to cover the legal expenses associated with problems that developed while Newsom was governor.

“California lost hundreds of millions to hospice fraud, and now taxpayers are being forced to pay a million-dollar legal bill to defend the mess,” Tangipa said.

Tangipa also connected the controversy to speculation about Newsom’s political future.

Newsom’s administration rejects the Republican criticism and maintains that California has taken substantial steps to combat healthcare fraud.

Newsom’s Office Responds

Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson for Newsom, said California is cooperating with congressional investigators despite the administration’s belief that politics are influencing the federal inquiries.

The governor’s office says it takes fraud seriously and intends to continue protecting California’s healthcare programs while responding to congressional requests.

California Department of Finance spokesperson H.D. Palmer has similarly argued that the state is facing politically motivated legal actions from Washington.

Republican investigators offer a sharply different explanation.

They say their investigation is focused on determining whether California maintained sufficient internal controls to protect taxpayers and patients from fraud.

Congress Investigates California Hospice Programs

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform launched an investigation into California’s hospice programs in March.

Committee Chairman James Comer, a Kentucky Republican, requested documents and communications from Newsom concerning California’s efforts to detect and prevent fraud.

In its letter to the governor, the committee said it was concerned that California may not have had sufficient internal controls to identify fraudulent activity.

The committee is examining how state agencies licensed and monitored hospice providers and whether warning signs should have prompted stronger action.

The investigation does not itself establish wrongdoing by Newsom or his administration. It is an ongoing congressional inquiry into the state’s oversight practices.

Massive $267 Million Fraud Case

Concerns surrounding California’s healthcare system intensified after state Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a major hospice fraud prosecution in April.

California authorities charged 21 people in connection with an alleged scheme involving approximately $267 million in fraudulent Medi-Cal claims.

Advertisements

According to the California Department of Justice, investigators allege that personal information belonging to people living outside California was obtained through the dark web.

The stolen identities were allegedly used to enroll unsuspecting people in Medi-Cal.

Authorities say the defendants acquired 14 hospice companies through straw owners and then submitted claims for hospice services that were never provided.

The alleged patients were not receiving legitimate hospice care and did not know their identities were being used, according to prosecutors.

The defendants face criminal charges, but those charges remain allegations. They are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

California Says Its Safeguards Caught the Fraud

Newsom and Bonta have pointed to the prosecution as evidence that California is actively combating fraud rather than ignoring it.

State officials say suspicious activity was detected, improper payments were stopped and fraudulent providers were suspended.

California has also tightened its oversight of the hospice industry.

According to the California Department of Justice, during Bonta’s tenure the department conducted 294 hospice-related investigations, filed 119 criminal cases and secured 51 hospice-related convictions.

The state also launched a hospice fraud initiative in 2025 intended to help patients, healthcare workers and families identify suspicious activity.

Those enforcement figures form a central part of California’s response to criticism from Washington.

Federal Investigators Still Have Questions

Congressional Republicans argue that successful prosecutions do not resolve the larger question of whether stronger oversight could have prevented some fraudulent activity before taxpayer money was lost.

That distinction has become central to the dispute.

California officials point to arrests, prosecutions, provider suspensions and stronger safeguards as evidence that the state is addressing fraud.

Federal investigators are examining whether weaknesses in the system allowed fraudulent providers to operate in the first place.

The House Oversight Committee has requested records concerning California’s internal controls and oversight procedures as part of that investigation.

Taxpayer Costs Move Into the Spotlight

The political battle now extends beyond the original fraud allegations.

Newsom’s latest funding request raises another question for taxpayers: how much will California ultimately spend responding to federal investigations and legal disputes?

Republicans are portraying the additional legal spending as another cost resulting from inadequate state oversight.

Newsom’s administration argues that California must have the resources necessary to respond to congressional inquiries and defend state programs against what it considers politically motivated investigations.

Those are competing political interpretations of the same funding request.

What Happens Next?

The California Department of Finance is expected to consider the latest $1 million request after lawmakers have had time to review the proposal.

If approved, the additional funding would increase the amount provided to Newsom’s office for these legal matters to approximately $2.25 million.

Meanwhile, congressional investigators continue examining California’s hospice oversight, while state officials continue pursuing healthcare fraud cases and defending their enforcement record.

For taxpayers, the central questions are likely to remain straightforward: how did fraudulent operators obtain access to government healthcare dollars, were existing safeguards strong enough to stop them, and how much more public money will California spend responding to the investigations?

With hundreds of millions of dollars in alleged fraudulent billing already uncovered in one major case, the answers could have implications well beyond the current political fight.