Here’s what they are doing now.
House Republicans are launching a new offensive against federal judges appointed by former President Barack Obama, arguing that some members of the judiciary have overstepped their authority and interfered with key Trump administration policies.
The latest impeachment efforts target two Obama-appointed judges and highlight a growing battle between congressional Republicans and the federal court system.
For many conservatives, the fight is about more than individual rulings. It is about who should have the final say on immigration, border security, and the enforcement of federal law.
Republican Lawmakers Target Judge Over Immigration Decision
Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) recently introduced articles of impeachment against Chief U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr. after the judge blocked a Trump administration immigration policy.
The policy temporarily paused asylum requests and immigration benefit applications from individuals coming from countries considered national security risks.
Republicans argue the administration was attempting to strengthen border security and protect Americans from potential threats. McConnell ruled against the policy, prompting criticism from lawmakers who believe federal judges should not undermine executive authority on matters involving national security.
Steube’s impeachment resolution accuses McConnell of disregarding legitimate security concerns and placing the interests of non-citizens ahead of the safety of American citizens.
McConnell was nominated by former President Barack Obama and confirmed to the federal bench in 2011.
Second Obama-Appointed Judge Faces Impeachment Push
At the same time, Georgia Republicans are pursuing impeachment resolutions against U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross after a federal misconduct investigation uncovered troubling allegations.
The investigation found Ross engaged in conduct that violated judicial standards and ethics rules.
According to investigators, Ross was involved in an inappropriate relationship with an Atlanta law enforcement official that allegedly took place inside courthouse chambers during working hours. The investigation also raised concerns about participation in political activities and questions regarding statements made during the inquiry.
Although Ross remains on the federal bench, disciplinary action was taken and restrictions were placed on her future leadership roles within the judiciary.
The findings have fueled Republican calls for greater accountability throughout the federal court system.
Why Republicans Say This Matters
Many conservatives have grown increasingly frustrated with judges who have blocked Trump administration policies on immigration, law enforcement, and border security.
Supporters of impeachment argue that judges wield enormous power and should face consequences when they abuse that authority or violate ethical standards.
The latest impeachment resolutions are part of a broader effort by Republicans to challenge what they view as judicial activism.
Several federal judges have come under scrutiny this year after issuing rulings that delayed or halted Trump administration actions involving deportations, immigration enforcement, and national security.
House Judiciary Committee Will Decide Next Steps
The impeachment resolutions have been referred to the House Judiciary Committee, which is chaired by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).
Jordan and other Republican leaders have repeatedly raised concerns about federal judges issuing nationwide rulings that affect millions of Americans.
Whether the resolutions advance remains uncertain.
Under the Constitution, federal judges receive lifetime appointments and can only be removed through impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate.
A Senate conviction requires a two-thirds majority, making removal extremely difficult.
Democrats Have Joined The Impeachment Trend
Republicans are not the only lawmakers pursuing impeachment efforts.
Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee recently introduced articles of impeachment against Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, accusing him of ethics violations and conflicts of interest.
The move highlights the growing political tensions surrounding the federal judiciary and the increasing willingness of lawmakers from both parties to challenge judges they disagree with.
Judicial Impeachment Is Rare
Throughout American history, judicial impeachment has been uncommon.
Only a handful of federal judges have ever been removed from office, and most cases involved serious misconduct such as bribery, corruption, or perjury.
Still, many Republicans argue that public confidence in the courts depends on accountability and transparency.
As disputes over immigration, border security, and executive authority continue to dominate Washington, the battle between Congress and the federal judiciary may only be getting started.
The Bottom Line
The impeachment resolutions targeting Obama-appointed judges represent the latest chapter in an escalating struggle over the role of the federal courts.
Republicans say they are defending constitutional government, national security, and accountability. Critics argue impeachment should remain reserved for the most serious misconduct.
Either way, the outcome of these efforts could have lasting consequences for the balance of power between Congress, the White House, and the federal judiciary.