These judges think they run the country and Trump doesn’t like that.
President Donald J. Trump is making bold moves in Washington once again—this time taking on activist judges who have repeatedly blocked his America First policies. As part of his new “One Big Beautiful Bill,” Trump is pushing a powerful provision that would limit courts from halting government action unless plaintiffs post a financial bond. This would help shield taxpayers from the legal chaos created by politically motivated lawsuits.
Restoring Accountability in the Courts
Since returning to the Oval Office, President Trump’s executive actions—especially on border security, immigration enforcement, and taxpayer protection—have faced nonstop interference from liberal judges. Many of these court rulings have come in the form of preliminary injunctions, halting Trump’s reforms before they can be implemented.
The new measure would require any party seeking to block a federal policy through the courts to first post a bond—ensuring that if the ruling is later overturned, the American people aren’t left footing the bill.
Grassley Backs Trump’s Fight for Common Sense Legal Reform
Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), a longtime champion of law and order, included the bond requirement in the Senate Judiciary Committee’s proposed reconciliation bill. His office described the move as enforcing an existing but underused rule to make sure the legal system doesn’t become a weapon against duly elected leadership.
“This measure ensures that when the courts block lawful government actions, the financial burden doesn’t fall on hardworking taxpayers,” Grassley’s office stated.
In a Fox News op-ed, Grassley emphasized that the bill also delivers “historic investments in border security, law enforcement, and immigration reform”—key promises from President Trump’s 2024 campaign.
Fighting Back Against Judicial Overreach
For years, conservatives have grown frustrated as activist judges have used injunctions and contempt rulings to delay or derail conservative policies. In May, the House passed a version of the bill that further restricts judges from punishing officials who violate these court orders—steps often used to force compliance through threats of fines or jail time.
Trump allies say it’s time to fight back.
This bill represents a clear message: The courts should not be used to obstruct the will of the people or the work of a President fighting for America’s future.
Liberal Critics Oppose the Reform—But the American People Deserve Fairness
Predictably, progressive voices have spoken out. One former federal prosecutor warned that public interest groups could be discouraged from filing lawsuits. However, many Americans believe that courtrooms should be places of justice—not political activism.
While critics claim the reform limits “access to justice,” grassroots conservatives argue it simply restores balance. For too long, unelected judges have acted as gatekeepers for radical agendas, while hardworking Americans suffer the consequences.
What’s Next in the Senate?
The fate of the bill now rests in the U.S. Senate. In order to pass through budget reconciliation—a process that allows legislation to move forward without 60 votes—the Senate parliamentarian must rule the bond requirement as budget-related.
Still, with rising support among GOP lawmakers and increasing frustration among voters, many believe this is a key moment to restore law and order, protect our Constitution, and put America first once again.