Here’s what Democrats are mad about now.
A House Republican is proposing a major overhaul that could eliminate several of Congress’ most well-known identity-based caucuses, setting the stage for another heated debate over race, representation, and equal treatment in Washington.
On Thursday, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) introduced legislation aimed at ending House caucuses based on race, ethnicity, or national origin. The measure would effectively dismantle several long-standing organizations within Congress if it is approved.
Among the groups that could be affected are the Congressional Black Caucus, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, organizations that have long played influential roles within the Democratic Party.
The proposal could also impact Republican-affiliated organizations, including the Black Republican Congressional Staff Association, the GOP Latino Staff Association, and the Republican Asian American Staff Association.
Mace said Congress should not recognize organizations that limit membership based on race or ethnicity, arguing that lawmakers should represent all Americans equally regardless of background.
In a statement announcing the proposal, Mace argued that race-based caucuses promote division instead of unity. She said Congress should move away from identity politics and focus on treating every American equally under the law.
The South Carolina Republican also said taxpayers should not be supporting organizations that distinguish members based on race or ethnicity.
Democrats Push Back
The proposal immediately drew criticism from Democratic leaders.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and other senior Democrats defended the caucuses, saying they have served Congress for decades and will continue to play an important role regardless of Mace’s resolution.
The legislation is expected to face an uphill battle even in the Republican-controlled House. While Democrats are almost certain to oppose it, some Republicans may also be hesitant to support such a sweeping change to House rules.
Debate Over Identity Politics
The resolution comes as Republicans continue challenging diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives across the country.
Many conservatives argue government institutions should adopt colorblind policies that treat every citizen equally rather than organizing programs or groups around race or ethnicity. Supporters of congressional caucuses, however, maintain the organizations help address issues affecting specific communities and provide a stronger voice for their members.
The debate has intensified following Republican-backed redistricting efforts in several Southern states that reshaped multiple congressional districts represented by members of the Congressional Black Caucus.
Jeffries, who belongs to the Congressional Black Caucus and could become the first Black Speaker of the House if Democrats regain control, remains one of the group’s most prominent members.
Mace’s Final Legislative Push
It remains unclear whether Mace will seek a full House vote before leaving Congress in January.
During her final months in office, she has introduced several bills centered on conservative priorities, including legislation addressing DEI programs, transgender participation in women’s sports, and birthright citizenship.
Mace also declined to run for the Senate seat formerly held by the late Sen. Lindsey Graham and recently endorsed Rep. Ralph Norman in South Carolina’s competitive Republican primary.
Whether the resolution advances or not, it highlights the growing divide in Washington over identity politics, equal treatment, and the future of race-based organizations inside the halls of Congress.