America can do whatever it wants.
Retired NATO commander Gen. Wesley Clark is speaking out against a potential change in how the United States handles its top military leadership role in Europe. But many are asking: is this just more fearmongering from the old guard?
According to reports, President Trump’s team is exploring whether the U.S. should step back from its role as Supreme Allied Commander of NATO—a position we’ve held for over 70 years.
“A Gift to Putin” or Common Sense for America?
General Clark, appearing on NewsNation, warned that such a move would “decouple” the U.S. from NATO and would be a win for the Kremlin. He argued that keeping American leadership in place is essential for cooperation and intelligence-sharing.
But is it really? Or is it just another case of Europe relying on American strength while doing little themselves?
Clark even admitted that most of his NATO expenses were covered by Belgium and NATO funds—highlighting what many see as the real issue: America pays the price, while Europe coasts.
“You don’t save anything,” Clark said. But for everyday Americans watching their taxes rise and their military stretched thin, the savings—and sovereignty—matter.
Trump’s Bold Vision: Prioritizing America First
President Trump has long criticized NATO for being unfair to American taxpayers. He’s demanded that European countries meet their defense spending commitments—something many have failed to do for decades.
Now, as his administration considers adjusting our global military commitments, supporters say it’s time to stop doing Europe’s job for them.
“NATO is a great deal for Europe but a raw deal for America,” said Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), reflecting a growing sentiment among America First conservatives.
Congress Reacts—But Is It Just More D.C. Drama?
Some Republican lawmakers, including Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL), are urging caution. They say the Pentagon shouldn’t act without consulting Congress or the White House.
Former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell added his voice, warning that a reduced U.S. presence could weaken NATO.
But many Americans are asking: When will Europe take responsibility for its own defense?
The Bottom Line: Should U.S. Taxpayers Keep Funding NATO?
The real question isn’t what the generals think—it’s what everyday Americans want. Are we better off leading NATO if it means footing the bill, or should we let Europe stand on its own two feet?
As debates heat up, one thing is clear: President Trump’s America First approach is once again challenging the status quo—and millions of hardworking Americans are paying attention.