Do Americans really want a V.P. who supports ideas like this?
In a recent development, Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, has faced scrutiny over past comments regarding Social Security. During a 2010 debate while running for Congress, Walz’s position on Social Security drew attention. At the time, Walz indicated that his proposed plan for Social Security was “very similar” to an approach that included raising the retirement age and adjusting withholding caps.
This debate, held on October 12, 2010, at Minnesota State University, Mankato, featured Walz, the Democratic incumbent, against Independent candidate Steve Wilson and Republican Randy Demmer. Each candidate was asked about their solutions for Social Security and Medicare in relation to the federal budget deficit.
Wilson, who addressed the issue first, advocated for a gradual increase in the retirement age and adjustments to the cap on earnings subject to Social Security taxes. He argued that these measures would help address the program’s financial challenges while ensuring that those affected were given sufficient notice and the opportunity for shared sacrifice.
When Walz spoke, he acknowledged that his ideas were “very similar” to Wilson’s proposals, praising Wilson’s plan as thoughtful and honest. Walz emphasized the importance of Social Security, citing his personal experience with the program following the death of his father during his high school years. He rejected any notion of partial privatization, framing Social Security as a crucial anti-poverty program.
However, Walz’s stance has been clarified by his campaign, which argues that he has since evolved his position. According to a source familiar with Walz’s views, the Governor does not support raising the retirement age today, contrary to what might be inferred from the 2010 debate. After winning his Congressional race, Walz consistently opposed proposals to increase the retirement age, including votes in 2012 and 2014 against such changes.
The Harris campaign has reiterated that Walz remains a staunch defender of Social Security. Spokesperson Joseph Costello highlighted Walz’s consistent voting record against raising the retirement age and his commitment to preserving Social Security. Costello also underscored Walz’s personal connection to the program, noting its role in supporting his family after his father, a veteran, passed away.
In summary, while Walz’s 2010 debate comments may suggest support for reforms, his subsequent actions and current stance demonstrate a commitment to protecting Social Security from major changes like increasing the retirement age.