Sorting by

×

VIDEO: Top Republican Accused Of Racism For Simple Mistake

Advertisements

YIKES! Sparks flew over such a simple mistake!

Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., found herself at the center of a heated debate after a recent CNN appearance where she mispronounced Vice President Kamala Harris’ name. During her segment on “CNN Newsnight,” Mace placed the emphasis on the wrong syllable when saying Harris’ name. This led to a strong reaction from Vanderbilt University professor Michael Eric Dyson and Democratic strategist Keith Boykin, who accused Mace of being disrespectful.

On the show, Mace was discussing Harris’ policies, which she claimed were aligned with those of President Biden. However, her repeated mispronunciation of “Kamala” drew sharp criticism from Boykin, who noted, “You had it right. You almost got it.” Mace, undeterred, responded firmly, “I will say Kamala’s name any way that I want to,” which only fueled the tension.

Dyson criticized Mace’s stance, asserting that mispronouncing Harris’ name was indicative of a broader issue of disrespect. He argued that such actions perpetuate a history of disregarding the humanity of Black individuals. Mace, however, rejected these claims, labeling them as baseless accusations of racism. She stated, “That is BS,” challenging Dyson’s assertions.

As the debate grew more intense, Dyson maintained that Mace’s refusal to correctly pronounce Harris’ name was part of a troubling tradition. Despite Mace’s insistence on her right to pronounce names as she sees fit, Dyson and Boykin continued to argue that the issue was about more than just pronunciation—it was about respect and historical context.

Advertisements

The confrontation reached its peak when Mace once again mispronounced Harris’ name, prompting a renewed outcry from the panel. Dyson declared, “It’s Kamala!” and Boykin joined in, accusing Mace of deliberately mispronouncing the name. Dyson ended the segment by charging, “You’re a White woman disrespecting a Black woman. That is problematic. That is racist.”

Throughout the exchange, CNN anchor Abby Phillip attempted to mediate, but the discussion remained charged, highlighting deep divides over issues of respect and historical sensitivity.

WATCH: